Proposing change of Lora Training Overview

I propose replacing the current tabular layout with a grid layout.

Current Layout: The current layout displays processes in a table format. This layout becomes cluttered and hard to manage when there are many processes, making it difficult to quickly find specific information.

Proposed Layout: The proposed grid layout would display each process in a separate card. This would allow for a cleaner, more organized view that can easily scale to accommodate more processes.

This change would provide the following advantages:

• Better Scalability: The grid layout can handle more processes without becoming cluttered.

• Improved Clarity: Each process is clearly separated, making it easier to distinguish between them.

• Enhanced Aesthetics: The grid layout looks more modern and appealing.

• Responsive Design: The layout adapts better to different screen sizes, making efficient use of space.

I have included a rough sketch in the attachment. I am not an expert in Paint, but it should illustrate what I mean.

Advantages of the Grid Layout over the Tabular View

1. Better Scalability:

   • Manage More Processes Simultaneously: The grid layout allows for displaying many processes at once without requiring the user to scroll excessively.

   • Visual Relief: By distributing information across multiple cards, the user’s eyes are less strained, even when many processes are displayed simultaneously.

2. Improved Clarity:

   • Visual Hierarchy: Each process is contained within a separate card, making it easier to distinguish between individual processes at a glance.

   • Easy Identification: Key information, such as progress or error messages, can be visually highlighted within the cards, facilitating quick identification and prioritization.

3. Aesthetic Enhancements:

   • Modern Design: A grid layout looks more modern and appealing, enhancing the user experience and presenting a more professional appearance.

   • Design Flexibility: Cards in the grid can have different designs and colors to highlight different statuses or importance levels.

4. Responsive Design:

   • Adaptation to Different Screen Sizes: The grid layout adapts more easily to various screen sizes, benefiting users with different devices (PC, tablet, smartphone).

   • Optimal Space Utilization: The layout can dynamically adjust to the available screen width, making efficient use of the available space.

5. Interactive Elements:

   • Easier Interaction: Interactive elements such as buttons, progress bars, or status indicators can be more clearly and user-friendly integrated into the cards.

   • Direct Actions: Users can perform actions directly within the cards (e.g., pause, cancel) without needing to scroll through a long list.

6. Faster Information Absorption:

   • Compact Display: Key information can be compactly and clearly summarized within a card, increasing the speed of information absorption.

   • Clear Separation: Each process is clearly separated from others, preventing confusion and making navigation easier.